![]() Those of us who don’t go to warzones mostly work at intelligence centers like Maryland’s Fort Meade, home of the National Security Agency. If that’s the way the Army wants it, maybe linguists like me shouldn’t actually deploy at all. Meanwhile, the military linguists on my team simply sat to one side, numbly monitoring equipment and our computer screens for uneventful hours on end. Rumor was he made over $200,000 - easily five times my paycheck. A native of Mosul, he was one of two contractors who would complete every language-related task required for the rest of our deployment. When I arrived for my first shift in-country, I quickly saw who would be turning those purloined insurgent communications into English: a large, middle-aged Arab dude, not me. It was my first sign that the deployment wouldn’t be the one I trained for. It turned out that our five-man team had as many Korean speakers as Arabic ones - you know, for all the Korean spoken in the Iraqi desert. ![]() So imagine my surprise when my new team sergeant picked me up at the airfield and mentioned he was a Korean linguist. I figured I’d be translating captured Arabic communications to alert combat troops of danger. In March 2009, I stepped off of a Blackhawk at Forward Operating Base Delta, a large base near al-Kut in southeastern Iraq. Over two years of training followed, both in Arabic and the specific intelligence duties I’d need to perform in-country. In the fall of 2006, I enlisted in the Army as a cryptologic linguist, one of the soldiers who translate foreign communications. In Iraq and Afghanistan, private-sector linguists are largely replacing their military counterparts rather than augmenting their numbers, an expensive redundancy. At the same time, it uses costly contractors to work the same jobs for which its own linguists have trained. The Army spends years and hundreds of thousands of dollars training each of its foreign-language speakers. 107-122, 2008.Max Rosenthal explains “ How The Army Wastes Linguists Like Me.” 617, The Politics of History in Comparative Perspective. ![]() “The Japanese History Textbook Controversy in East Asian Perspective.†The Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Vol. “The Japan-South Korea Identity Clash.†New York: Columbia University Press. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Comparative Introduction.†New York: Palgrave McMillan, pp. “The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy.†London: Frances Pinter, 115- 169, 1980. ![]() “International Politics A Framework for Analysis New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. “Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction.†New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach California: Sage Publications Inc, pp. South Korea accuses Tokyo of having "political motivation" and "discrimination" in the two countries' growing conflict and rooted in wartime history.Ĭ. South Korea plans to file complaints over tightening Japanese export controls to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Even today, South Korea still voiced its past suffering caused by Japan and raised tension between the two countries. Relations between Japan and South Korea are very close to what happened in the past. The issue that will be raised is how history can shape decision-making in relations between Japan and South Korea, leading to a trade war like today. These goods are very important for the industry in South Korea, especially in the smartphone industry, thus making South Korea furious about the Japanese action. The materials are photoresists used in the semiconductor industry, hydrogen fluoride as a material for making chips and fluorinated polymides that are used as materials for making smartphone screens. In July, Japan imposed tighter controls on the export of three raw materials in chips and smart phone screens to South Korea. As we know, this trade war was preceded by restrictions on exports by Japan to South Korea. Japan itself has now downgraded the status of South Korea which was originally included in group A or White List Countries or Preferred Trade Partner List Countries into group B, namely countries and regions participating in international export control regimes and satisfying certain conditions (Excluding those in group A). South Korea is currently counteracting by boycotting goods originating from Japan, such as FMCG (fast-moving consumer goods) companies, fast retaling and automotive. The trade war between Japan and South Korea is now entering a new phase.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |